World in Motion
Archive for October 13th, 2011
Tweedlemitt vs. Tweedlebarack?
Posted by Scott Erb in 2010 Elections, 2012 Election, Afghanistan, Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Democrats, Economic crisis, Mitt Romney, Occupy Wall Street, Protest, Republicans, Tea Party on October 13, 2011
It is a match up that the tea party and Occupy Wall Street will abhor. An inside the beltway Republican whose Massachusetts health care plan was the blue print for President Obama’s health care reform vs. an establishment Democrat who choose Wall Street insiders as his economic team rather than more radical economic mavericks. President Obama is among the 1% the OWS oppose.
It’s too early to know for sure that Mitt Romney will be the GOP candidate, but it certainly looks that way as he lines up endorsements. At this point in 2008 Hillary Clinton looked like a shoe in for the Democratic nomination so there still could be surprises. Yet none of Romney’s rivals have anything like the campaign juggernaut Obama already had in place in 2007 and in modern politics that’s what matters.
Mitt Romney is everything the tea party supposedly opposed. He is Mormon (not Christian in the eyes of some fundamentalists), he’s been pro-choice in the past, and he governed liberal Massachusetts in a markedly moderate manner. Like former President Clinton he seems adept at saying what an audience wants to hear, but once in power his pragmatism will mean he’s unlikely to push for tea party ideas that don’t play well with the majority. In short, he won’t fight for the right wing, he’ll govern to try to solve problems. A Romney Presidency may not be that much different than an Obama Presidency!
To both the tea party and OWS it leaves little choice. Most will vote for the guy on their side out of a desire to prevent the other guy from winning. But many true believers may sit this out or vote for a third party out of protest.
For the GOP the focus will be negative advertising against Obama, mostly by special interest groups not directly associated with Romney. That way he’s not tied to the tactics and can even criticize them while they push the tea party to vote Romney out of fear/hatred of Obama. It would be winning ugly, but a win is a win.
For Obama the goal is to infiltrate the OWS movement and try to direct its energy into participation in the 2012 election, recapturing the fervor of 2008. The idea is that motivated students and young people, as well as others caught up in the protest, will be more likely to vote than otherwise would be the case. If they aren’t excited for Obama, they can be lured to vote against Romney through negative advertising, or brought to the voting both for ballot issues or lower ballot races reflecting the movement’s ideals.
Obama looks vulnerable, but given the economy he could be in much worse shape. His third quarter haul for fund raising was $70 million, down from $80 million in Q2, but above expectations. This means he already has raised about $200 million overall, and the heaviest fundraising hasn’t even started yet. He’s likely to top $1 billion, and money matters in modern campaigns. Moreover, with no primary opponent this time he can focus entirely on defeating the eventual Republican nominee.
The GOP, meanwhile, has been suffering the same kind of let down that the Democrats experienced after 2008. They took the House, but the tea party’s allure has faded and Obama’s numbers remain just under 50% approval. Obama’s foreign policy also has turned out to be a strong point. Besides being generally liked and respected abroad, he’s mixed a tough counter-terrorism policy (killing many top al qaeda leaders including Osama Bin Laden) with a reasonably effective draw down of forces in Iraq. Even Afghanistan appears more stable than it used to be, and the GOP will have trouble making the argument that Obama is soft or ineffective on foreign policy.
It all comes down to the economy, but Republican success in 2010 gives Obama a tool in 2012. He can blame the GOP for not passing a jobs bill and standing in the way of compromises that could have moved the economy forward. This is already being said, Vice President Biden claimed recently that the Republicans want to “sabotage the economy.” In a close election if doubt can be cast on which party really should be blamed for economic conditions, that helps Obama.
All that said, Romney is a consummate politician who unlike the rest of the GOP field is making no unforced errors and doing nothing that will come back to haunt him in the general election (unlike Rick Perry, whose social security stance will cost him elderly voters if he’s the nominee). He’s managed to play the tea party favorites off against each other and appeal to the average Republican — those more concerned about competence and beating Obama. He’s not totally ignoring Iowa this time and has an operation in New Hampshire that is almost sure to bring him a big victory there. He’s got a better than even chance of avoiding a long, bloody primary battle.
While he seems slick, he also appears calm and competent. Independents disappointed with Obama won’t be scared away from Romney the way they might be from Cain or Perry (let alone Bachmann or Palin!) If the economy is still in the dumps, it will be relatively easy for people to say, “well, let’s try Romney, let’s see what he can do.”
The question is whether Romney can inspire support, something I noted awhile back when I compared him to Mondale. Here is where the left and right “movements” become interesting. Romney’s capacity to appeal to the center is clear, but can he keep the loyalty and enthusiasm of the activists, people who until now have been very cool to a Romney candidacy? Assuming no third party candidacy, many tea party folk may decide they can’t stomach Mitt as the GOP standard barrier and wait for 2016 and a chance to nominate a “true Christian conservative.”
OWS has two dangers for Obama. First, just as the tea party scared off moderates from the GOP, OWS arouses skepticism as well. Just as Nixon used the 1968 protests in his favor, Romney could argue that the country needs to return to a more stable and predictable government. Second, OWS could turn on Obama and urge people to sit out the election. Despite Republican rhetoric, Obama’s policies have been very friendly to Wall Street and the business community. To OWS he’s shown that he’s not a true progressive, they may feel compelled to sit out and try to nominate someone fresh in 2016. Romney won’t cause fear based Obama voting in the way that a Perry might.
It’s still very early and things could change rapidly. But right now the 2012 campaign looks to be fascinating. In a country that appears divided with rival left and right movements, the probable candidates are centrist and more alike then most people realize. Comparisons with past elections are of little help — the Obama campaign machine and the nature of this crisis will assure 2012 will be a unique, perhaps historic election. Let the fun begin!
-
You are currently browsing the archives for Thursday, October 13th, 2011
- Join 1,494 other subscribers
Blogroll
- Bartcop
- Brain Cooties
- Brave Smart Bold
- Bruce the Economist
- Bucket List Productions
- Chic Press (poetry)
- Dissertation Gal
- Families are Built with Love
- Girrlearth
- Inner Simplicity with Empathic Guidance
- Jeff\’s Blog
- Juan Cole
- Knocked Over by a Feater
- Left hook the blog
- Life as I know it Photography
- List of X
- Lora Parisien begin
- Marge in Italy
- Mookie is Mike
- Norbrook's Blog
- Notes Along the Path
- Pamanner
- Pleasecutthecrap
- Power of Positive Thought
- Pressing Pause
- Reflections of a Rational Republican
- Tarheel Red
- The Cezzar Joint
- The Fruitioncoalition
- the havens
- The oil drum
- The Third Eve
- Windows Toward the World
- Woodgate's view
- WordPress.com
Archives
- July 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (2)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (3)
- December 2018 (1)
- November 2018 (4)
- September 2018 (2)
- June 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (3)
- February 2018 (1)
- November 2017 (4)
- August 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (5)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (3)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (2)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (9)
- February 2016 (2)
- January 2016 (3)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (6)
- October 2015 (3)
- September 2015 (3)
- August 2015 (6)
- July 2015 (3)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (1)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (7)
- October 2014 (5)
- September 2014 (7)
- August 2014 (8)
- July 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (6)
- May 2014 (8)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (7)
- February 2014 (2)
- January 2014 (4)
- December 2013 (4)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (6)
- September 2013 (6)
- August 2013 (3)
- July 2013 (3)
- May 2013 (4)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (9)
- December 2012 (11)
- November 2012 (14)
- October 2012 (18)
- September 2012 (20)
- August 2012 (15)
- July 2012 (13)
- June 2012 (14)
- May 2012 (11)
- April 2012 (9)
- March 2012 (11)
- February 2012 (13)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (18)
- November 2011 (17)
- October 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (16)
- August 2011 (25)
- July 2011 (18)
- June 2011 (21)
- May 2011 (23)
- April 2011 (11)
- March 2011 (14)
- February 2011 (12)
- January 2011 (16)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (12)
- October 2010 (16)
- September 2010 (13)
- August 2010 (14)
- July 2010 (14)
- June 2010 (12)
- May 2010 (13)
- April 2010 (14)
- March 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (13)
- January 2010 (10)
- December 2009 (16)
- November 2009 (15)
- October 2009 (12)
- September 2009 (19)
- August 2009 (17)
- July 2009 (15)
- June 2009 (18)
- May 2009 (16)
- April 2009 (19)
- March 2009 (25)
- February 2009 (24)
- January 2009 (16)
- December 2008 (16)
- November 2008 (23)
- October 2008 (30)
- September 2008 (25)
- August 2008 (27)
- July 2008 (20)
- June 2008 (33)
- May 2008 (23)
Recent Comments