Archive for February, 2017
All six of these things happened.
That’s why so many Americans can’t treat him as a normal President. That’s why the response to him has been so widespread and deep. There is a sense that he’s impulsive, insecure and dangerous.
Let’s go one by one:
1) Is the US as bad as Putin’s Russia? Certainly some on the far left think so. And the US has killed innocents in pursuit of its aims. But at least so far domestic political opponets haven’t been jailed, poisoned and denied a voice. Perhaps Trump is tolerant of Putin because he deep down would like to just stifle opposition and control things himself? Republicans have been adamant that Trump’s moral relativism on this issue is wrong – they may be waking up to how dangerous this President can be.
2) A threat to “defund” California is bizarre. As the graphic notes, California pays more in federal taxes than it gets back (the biggest receivers of federal money are the so-called red states, ironically). Trump claims California is “out of control.” Well – outside his control, as it considers making itself a ‘sanctuary state.’ But defunding California would be utterly unconstitutional and insane – the fact Trump makes that kind of threat shows he doesn’t understand the Constitution. In fact, Trump could learn from how Governor Jerry Brown took a state that was in financial crisis and turned things around.
3) This is nefarious and dark. Judges rule based on the law, and this conservative jurist, appointed by President Bush, ruled the executive order on immigration was likely unconstitutional, and thus put it on hold until it could be examined. This means that the normal reality of the past decade continues – only well vetted immigrants can enter. Yet Trump wants people to blame this individual judge if any kind of terrorism happens. That’s an incitement to violence against the judicial branch. To me, that statement is so dangerous and disgusting that it rises to an impeachable offense.
4) Something like elevating someone to the National Security Council is a big deal. If a President is going to do it, he should know he’s doing it. If he does not, that suggests that he is lazy, letting others do the work, and simply being bombastic when his emotions get the better of him. As Trump might put it: Not good.
5) The last economic collapse was caused by Wall Street. It was a free market crisis, as unregulated mortgage backed bonds (as well as CDO’s and other ominous financial instruments) created an environment where loans were given to anyone, without regard to their ability to pay, and people fed into a massive speculative bubble. If government regulations like those CFTC head Brooksley Born advocated in the 90s had been in place, this might not have happened. The response since then has been meager; the banks still have the capacity to manipulate the system, and those who created the crisis have not been punished. Trump’s actions take away even those meager protections and set up another bubble and financial collapse — but only after hundreds of billions of dollars are made on Wall Street by the financial class.
6) Perhaps most disturbing is that the truth is irrelevant to Trump. Anything negative about him is fake news. He’ll claim his inauguration crowd was the largest in history, even though it’s laughable. His world of “alternate facts” suggest it’s all marketing, a big con.
The secret of the con is to keep up confidence (con man comes from confidence man). That means never admitting one is wrong. Simply lie, but do so persuasively, after creating conditions where the marks (victims) want to believe. Trump has made a living doing this, the truth is irrelevant to him. Now as President he’s taken this to a new level, but finds that the press investigates every claim and calls him on the carpet for falsehoods. When he demands his spokespeople repeat the lies, they are mocked very effectively by satire, such as Melissa McCarthy’s devastating portrayal of Trump press secretary Sean Spicer. Threatening the press has only made the press more intent on outing any administration misdeeds.
For those who say, “give him a chance,” or “pray for the President to do his best,” I reject that as abdicating our duty as individuals to be on watch for threats to the Republic. Maybe President Trump will learn that this isn’t a reality show, and recognize that his current path is leading him to spectacular failure. Maybe he will learn to make better choices. But that won’t happen unless the opposition call him on his lies, explore and lay bare the consequences of his policies, and not be intimidated.
As a political scientist I’ve always believed in the importance of accepting election results as legitimate, and treating whoever is elected with respect. Democracy rests on a belief that opposition and disagreement are good, and that it is a good idea to have power switch between parties – one party in power for too long leads to corruption.
The election of Donald Trump is forcing me to question my long standing belief that American democracy has a political culture and institutions capable of protecting democratic principles regardless of who is President.
It’s not just that I don’t agree with Donald Trump. I disagreed with George W. Bush’s decision to go to war in Iraq, but never thought he lacked respect for America’s core ideals. I disagreed with his method and some of his beliefs about how the world works, but knew that at base we shared a respect for democracy and individual rights.
I’m not convinced Donald Trump shares that. After his election I wrote “don’t panic.” Well, panic is never good so yes, don’t panic. But I believed that the Republican party would need to help Trump cope with his new role, and thus experts and advisors would lead him to a series of policies that respected democracy.
Oh, there might be big fights. There always are. But if you lose fights now, that just means working harder to win the next election so you can win the next battle. Those loses might be really painful; the choice of war in 2003 has lead to tragic consequences globally, including many of the problems in the Mideast today. Politics involves fights about consequential things.
But this seems different. Alternate facts. Fights about crowd size. An immigration executive order that shows no empathy for the well vetted people who in good faith have waited for a visa to immigrate, or who are fleeing a war zone. Calling a Judge who temporarily rescinds that order a “so-called Judge.” Twitter rants aimed at the media and normal citizens, a President who thinks it’s OK to insult and ridicule others.
Or the role of Steve Bannon, who is on record predicting a war with China within five years, a PR maven movie maker, now given a seat on the National Security Council. The President having angry phone calls with other world leaders, and who by all accounts lives to seek revenge against those he considers “enemies.” Utter disdain for the press, talk of toughening up libel laws (really – does he think the President can sue someone for libel?)
Republicans say he’s still learning the job. Others say he is psychologically unstable. But for the first time, I wonder if consumerism and nationalism may finally be overcoming our core American values.
This has happened before. Joe McCarthy launched a proto-fascist witch hunt that went on for years before he was stopped. Then it was a mix of courageous reporters like Edward R. Murrow and people in his own party, like Margaret Chase Smith, who brought down McCarthy.
If President Trump keeps up this behavior, we’ll need to rely on the media to report everything and not be intimidated by the White House. We’ll have to rely on Republicans, many of whom are silently fuming at Trump’s antics, some of whom have already spoken out. I believe that the Speaker of the House Paul Ryan has a moral conscience and a strong belief in American democracy. So do most of his Republican colleagues in the House and Senate.
President Trump can only do so much without Congressional support. Most Republicans want to work with the President to promote conservative ideas. But they need to stand up to him if he maintains his current reckless approach. They need to recognize that democracy trumps party loyalty. Democrats and liberals will protest and resist, and that’s important. But when it comes to governmental power, Republican legislators have a responsibility to step up should Trump’s behavior continue to defy the norms and values that define American democracy.
Farmington, Maine, March 6, 2041
Now that the world has settled into a new equilibrium of sorts, it’s time to reflect on how things fell apart so completely. While we may never again see a world of mass consumption, convenience and material excess like that which existed when the century began, nobody expected it to unravel so quickly.
It started on January 16, 2018. 1-16. The day that, up until a few years ago, was considered the greatest terror attack in US history. President Donald Trump was set to give his second state of the union address. After a rocky first year, he was hoping to convince Americans that he could be trusted. This speech would be a big one. In the Capital they gathered – all the Senators, Congresspeople, Supreme Court Justices, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Vice President. Only 71 year old Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue was absent, watching the speech in the White House with Steve Bannon.
As President Trump began his speech there were some noises. People looked around, Trump seemed irritated. Then with the whole nation watching on television, there was a bolt of fire and then nothing – the feed stopped. In the capital a series of bombs exploded, utterly destroying the building and its occupants. The President, Vice President, Supreme Court and Congress, all branches of the US government were destroyed. ISIS took responsibility.
Steve Bannon had invited Sonny Perdue to the White House to watch the speech. He offered Perdue a drink, and the two joked. Within minutes Perdue had the symptoms of a heart attack, and was dead before Trump had even started. With no one left in the Presidential line of succession, and the Supreme Court gone, the US entered a constitutional crisis. Bannon was ready.
In Trump’s first year Bannon had identified military officers who would create potential problems for him on this night. He convinced the President they were disloyal and Trump fired them. Bannon maneuvered people he could manipulate to high ranking positions. Senator McCain had accused Trump of “promoting dimwits and dilettantes.” But McCain was now gone.
Steve Bannon called an emergency press conference. As the one remaining member of the National Security Council Principles group, he said that until a new set of elections could be arranged, he would be acting President. He was ready for the next part. He used all his skill as a movie maker and PR maven to orchestrate a move towards authoritarianism, with him in charge.
Bannon had plotted the attacks well, using foreign intelligence officers to do the dirty work, minimizing a chance someone would leak. Cities across the country suffered apparent attacks, FOX News became Bannon’s propaganda channel, and media controls were put in place “to assure public safety during this chaotic period.” With no Supreme Court, Bannon became a dictator. Everything was following his script.
He announced that to “rebuild the economy” he was defaulting on all debt, so America could start clean and ‘rebuild at home.’ Alas, the global economy doesn’t follow a script. The global financial system buckled, credit became impossible to get, and soon US unemployment hit 30%, and even China found itself in depression. Needing a distraction Bannon blamed ISIS and the US launched a war to “claim our oil in the Mideast.”
By the end of 2018 Americans started to realize that Bannon was out of control, with no checks or balances. Opposition coalesced around former President Obama, who called on Americans to reclaim their government. But with war and depression sowing fear, and media controls tight, Bannon’s propaganda machine kept many loyal to him. Obama was declared guilty of treason and had to lead the movement in hiding, uploading speeches and directives, staying one step ahead of the secret police.
With the economy in collapse and global governments deserting the US – China, Russia and the EU put together a non-aggression treaty and worked to undermine the US war in the Mideast — by 2020 it was clear Bannon was failing. Desperate, he turned to the use of nuclear weapons in the Mideast. That was the last straw. Resistance at home grew bolder, and on October 2, 2021 an internal coup removed Bannon. Later President Obama convened a “constitutional Congress” to plan a return to democracy.
The 20 years since then have been tough. The global economy has never recovered, and the war caused a long term energy crisis as the nuclear weapons rendered the oil fields unusable. Some say we’ve entered a new dark age, and for awhile it felt that way. But we’ve rediscovered the importance of community and nature, and lately the emergence of sustainable energy sources suggests we’re now on the right track.
Professor Thomas Percy argues that Bannon may have inadvertently saved humanity. The economic collapse and drastic decline in fossil fuel usage has led to CO2 levels in the atmosphere to stabilize, and are likely to soon decline. “On the path we were going, by now we’d be feeling a different kind of global crisis, and one that could have destroyed civilization. Now we have a chance.” That’s a plot twist that even Bannon couldn’t have scripted.