World in Motion
Archive for June 28th, 2012
The Right Ruling
Posted by Scott Erb in 2012 Election, Barack Obama, Democracy, Democrats, Health Care, John Boehner, Mitt Romney, Republicans on June 28, 2012
Thursday the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the Affordable Care Act, nicknamed “Obamacare” is indeed constitutional. In so doing, they rejected a judicial activism that would severely limit the democratic power of the people.
The ruling is causing confusion. Because the individual mandate (everyone has to buy insurance) is permissible due to the ability of the government to tax, some are claiming that this amounts to a huge tax increase. That’s false – people will be buying insurance, not paying a tax. Those who refuse to buy insurance will pay penalties. However for many Republicans, convinced by oral arguments that overturning the act was an almost sure thing (intrade had the likelihood at 75%), it’s an attempt to walk back the celebratory tone they’d been taking.
This also ensures that the debate in the run up to the 2012 election will be more serious than it has been. Until now the GOP has been simply opposing the law, saying they had ‘free market’ alternatives that will ‘increase choice.’ A close look shows that they evade most of the controversial issues. The emphasis has been on creating ire over Obamacare and hoping the Supreme Court would do the dirty work and strike down what will be very difficult for them to repeal.
With the Supreme Court saying that this is for Congress and the President to work out – Justice Roberts correctly noted that it is not the job of the Court to rule on the wisdom of the law – the politicians will ultimately have to get into the nitty gritty of the law. The Democrats will point out all of the positive aspects of the law and force Republicans to embrace some aspects of it. Republicans will have to confront the health care problems that face the country and offer plausible solutions.
In a perfect world, one could hope that such debate would yield good ideas from both sides of the aisle and a mutual willingness to improve the law. In the world we have that’s unlikely. The worst result is that a massive amount of money is spent to manipulate public opinion and drown out the serious side of the debate, saving politicians from having to deal with reality.
While that is certainly possible, this issue might defy that trend. If President Obama is re-elected, the Republicans will have to accept that a repeal is unlikely, and shift towards trying to make it work better. If Governor Romney is elected then his job will be more difficult. The Senate is likely to block an all out rejection of the law, and those helped by the popular provisions will put immense pressure on the GOP not to “throw the baby out with the bathwater.”
I suspect that in either case we’ll have a similar result. The two parties will recognize that the US now has a health care system that aspires to universal coverage and tries to contain costs. Information about what works and what isn’t working will guide reforms to the act. As with social security and medicare, over time it will be taken as natural to have a health care system; the biggest hurdle was the Supreme Court.

CNN’s initial coverage took a tidbit they heard early in the opinion – that the individual mandate was not allowed by the Commerce Clause – and mistakenly informed the world that the mandate was struck down, causing people to compare this with the early headline saying “Dewey defeats Truman.”
CNN’s “oops” moment pictured above was caused in part by the widespread belief that the act would be ruled unconstitutional. Most pundits were almost certain of the result, especially after the government seemed to do very poorly in oral arguments. But oral arguments rarely give a good glimpse of what the result will be, and on an issue like this oral arguments can be virtually irrelevant. The Justices have intense discussions to try to get the law right.
The most important aspect of this ruling is that the Supreme Court refused to interpose itself into an important political decision that should be left to the people and their representatives. This is the kind of issue that we as a society have to work through politically, and the Court should allow that. I’ve often agreed with conservatives who oppose judicial activism from the left; judicial activism is also wrong from the right.
Justice Roberts sent a signal today that while he has a conservative ideology, he wants to protect the Supreme Court’s integrity and reputation. I hope that this means that his court will refrain from judicial activism and leave most issues in the hands of the democratic institutions. There are important exceptions, of course, involving fundamental rights and equality under the law. But today Justice Roberts rose above politics and proved that he understands his role as Chief Justice.
-
You are currently browsing the archives for Thursday, June 28th, 2012
- Join 1,489 other followers
Blogroll
- Bartcop
- Brain Cooties
- Brave Smart Bold
- Bruce the Economist
- Bucket List Productions
- Chic Press (poetry)
- Dissertation Gal
- Families are Built with Love
- Girrlearth
- Inner Simplicity with Empathic Guidance
- Jeff\’s Blog
- Juan Cole
- Knocked Over by a Feater
- Left hook the blog
- Life as I know it Photography
- List of X
- Lora Parisien begin
- Marge in Italy
- Mookie is Mike
- Norbrook's Blog
- Notes Along the Path
- Pamanner
- Pleasecutthecrap
- Power of Positive Thought
- Pressing Pause
- Reflections of a Rational Republican
- Tarheel Red
- The Cezzar Joint
- The Fruitioncoalition
- the havens
- The oil drum
- The Third Eve
- Windows Toward the World
- Woodgate's view
- WordPress.com
Archives
- July 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (2)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (3)
- December 2018 (1)
- November 2018 (4)
- September 2018 (2)
- June 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (3)
- February 2018 (1)
- November 2017 (4)
- August 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (5)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (3)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (2)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (9)
- February 2016 (2)
- January 2016 (3)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (6)
- October 2015 (3)
- September 2015 (3)
- August 2015 (6)
- July 2015 (3)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (1)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (7)
- October 2014 (5)
- September 2014 (7)
- August 2014 (8)
- July 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (6)
- May 2014 (8)
- April 2014 (5)
- March 2014 (7)
- February 2014 (2)
- January 2014 (4)
- December 2013 (4)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (6)
- September 2013 (6)
- August 2013 (3)
- July 2013 (3)
- May 2013 (4)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (9)
- December 2012 (11)
- November 2012 (14)
- October 2012 (18)
- September 2012 (20)
- August 2012 (15)
- July 2012 (13)
- June 2012 (14)
- May 2012 (11)
- April 2012 (9)
- March 2012 (11)
- February 2012 (13)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (18)
- November 2011 (17)
- October 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (16)
- August 2011 (25)
- July 2011 (18)
- June 2011 (21)
- May 2011 (23)
- April 2011 (11)
- March 2011 (14)
- February 2011 (12)
- January 2011 (16)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (12)
- October 2010 (16)
- September 2010 (13)
- August 2010 (14)
- July 2010 (14)
- June 2010 (12)
- May 2010 (13)
- April 2010 (14)
- March 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (13)
- January 2010 (10)
- December 2009 (16)
- November 2009 (15)
- October 2009 (12)
- September 2009 (19)
- August 2009 (17)
- July 2009 (15)
- June 2009 (18)
- May 2009 (16)
- April 2009 (19)
- March 2009 (25)
- February 2009 (24)
- January 2009 (16)
- December 2008 (16)
- November 2008 (23)
- October 2008 (30)
- September 2008 (25)
- August 2008 (27)
- July 2008 (20)
- June 2008 (33)
- May 2008 (23)
Recent Comments