Time for Immigration Reform

Immigration is an issue sure to appeal to the most xenophobic, racist and jingoistic impulses in American politics.   Even relatively progressive people harbor some sense that those “Mexicans” are “different,” and thus react strongly against the idea of immigration reform that either makes it easier to move to the US, or for those here illegally to gain citizenship.

To be sure, there are legitimate issues on both sides of the debate.  Many legal immigrants resent the idea that others can come illegally and gain what they worked hard for.  Others are genuinely concerned about the economic impact, rule of law, or other issues which immigration reform may seem to threaten.   Those in favor recognize that there are 12 million illegal immigrants here, and there are no resources to enforce bans against them working under the table or living in the US.   The only way to fix the system is to accept this reality, and find a workable plan for the future.

To me, the issue is more profound.  America is changing.   The demographic profile of the country is shifting.  In not too long whites will constitute less than 50% of the population, and the “European” nature of American identity, already weakened, will be hard to maintain.  Moreover, this change is inevitable and can be a source for future strength of American ideals, even as those ideals continue their evolution.

Fox News’s John Gibson made headlines when he told people — white people — to make more babies (here’s the clip).   The threat he sees is that Hispanics might become the majority population in America, and Europe might become “Eurabia”.    To be fair, he tries to soften it at the end by saying “Hispanics can’t carry the whole load,” suggesting that we’re in this together, but the general feel of the piece is that there is a fear that western civilization is about to give way to the ‘darkies’ – Arabs, Hispanics, blacks, whatever.

Those fearing immigration often compare the US to the Roman Empire, noting how the Romans allowed “barbarians” to settle on Roman lands.   These Visigoths, Vandals, Huns and Ostrogoths adapted to Roman ways in order to prosper, but ultimately overthrew the empire and sacked Rome.   They see a parallel to how Mexicans are welcomed into the US, and fear we’ll become Mexamerica.

That comparison — and fear — is wrong on a number of counts.  First, in Rome the “barbarians” had been living in Rome for centuries, serving the Empire well, before Rome collapsed.  Rome’s collapse was not due to barbarian immigration but stagnation of their society.   It was a slow, steady decline, with no clear end point.  Even the popular 476 date, marking the end of the reign of Romulus Augustus, the last emperor of the western empire, is misleading.  The new ruler simply became King of that region, and life went on pretty much as it had.  Alaric, the Visigoth who sacked Rome in 410 had been an officer in the Roman legions.   The problem did not stem from the “barbarians” wanting to overthrow the empire, but the steady decline of the empire.

And if you want to make the comparison, the best one is found in Cullen Murphy’s book Are We Rome.   Our country and economy has given way to foreign capital.   Our debt and trade deficits depend on it.  If China or other  countries wanted, they could drive us into hyperinflation by refusing to finance, or in fact trying to cash in our debt.  The dollar would collapse, and then they could buy up our businesses and industries at cut rate prices.    If this happens slowly, over decades, we’ll gradually see increased foreign control over American business, and less sovereignty in terms of economic and foreign policies.   This would be the equivalent of the barbarians occupying Rome — foreign concerns controlling the American economy.  The cause wouldn’t be Chinese “barbarism,” but rather American decadence, greediness and poor judgment.    That is a better comparison with Rome than fear of Mexicans!

This phobia about Mexicans is also irrational given America’s past.   In 1790 nearly half of the country was of English descent, with about 20% more from Africa, mostly slaves.   About 15% were Irish, Scottish or Welsh.   Now the largest ethnic group is German, with 15.2%.   African Americans are about 13%, with the Irish about 11%.   The English, Welsh and Scots make up less than 10%.  Waves of immigration altered the country from being an extension of Great Britian to become a mix of groups.  Mexicans make up 8%, the fifth largest ethnic group in the US.   Hispanics (non-Mexicans) make up about 4% more.

In short, the US is not defined by ethnicity.   Nobody doubted General Richard Sanchez claim to be a true American general, or Colin Powell’s credentials.   A core of loons tried to question whether or not Barack Obama was a true American with stories that he was born in Kenya or had Indonesian citizenship, but they were laughed off.   Simply, America’s identity is not defined by ethnicity, but by core values.

The anti-immigrants know this.  They self-righteously (some honestly, some simply to avoid political incorrectness) talk about ‘rule of law’ and not rewarding illegal behavior.   Yet, of course, it was the rewarding of illegal behavior that brought this problem here.  We sustained an economic boom in the 90s on the backs of mostly Mexican immigrants, a large percentage coming illegally.  They were given jobs.  We needed their labor.  We benefited.  And now, as this becomes unsustainable over the long run due to the sheer numbers involved, we want to declare them the criminals, and pretend to be victims of some foreign invasion.   Thank you for your cheap labor that we lured you over here to provide, now we’ll return the favor by locking you up, destroying your lives, breaking up your families, and demonizing you as criminals.   Hypocrisy on parade yet again!

Another self-righteous argument is fear of terrorism.  But there are so many ways would be terrorists can enter the country that this is a fallacious argument.   Granting a path to citizenship to those already here in no way increases terror threats, after all!  And drug trade and the drug wars on the Mexican border?  Well, that is a problem Mexico has thanks to the fact Americans are so willing to large amounts for illegal drugs.  Either we need to clean up our act and stop demanding illegal substances, or we need to legalize them and regulate trade.

So let’s put  aside the racism, xenophobia, or fantasies that the US is a country defined by European heritage.  True, the “West” emerged from Europe — from the Roman Empire in fact — and we represent “western civilization.”   It’s a civilization we’ve tried to force on others through armed conflict, trying to spread ‘democracy and markets’ to places like Iraq and Afghanistan.   That hasn’t worked.  Perhaps the best way for the West to thrive is simply to stay open to others, and make it clear that the “West” is a set of ideas and principles, not defined by ethnic background or even economic development.

Now is the time for real immigration reform, recognizing the reality of shared interests between the US and Mexico, the need to give those who have been living here a path to citizenship, and a workable system of allowing work permits and immigration that reduces the temptation to cross illegally.  And sure, make the borders more secure at the same time, that can’t hurt.  Frankly, given the times we’re in, we need to unify as a country and not risk ethnic divisions that contradict our core values.

  1. #1 by Mike Lovell on April 9, 2009 - 15:22

    I too agree that there needs to be some serious immigration reform. We used to accept the poor from all over the world, and many went on to take full advantage of their new found freedom and become successful here, adding not only to a healthy economy, but bringing forth their culture as well, not as a spite to America, but to add to it.

    As we began our race toward a more high technology driven society, it seems the majority of our immigration became limited to highly educated individuals, forgetting that we still have a serious need for manual labor and other positions.

    Now, while I have nothing against people speaking a foreign language (Europe and everywhere around the world seems to accomodateus with English in their countries), I do believe in the need to make sure that immigrants do learn to speak english as a matter of being able to better market themselves, attend our schools, etc.

    I also think tht re-setting up points of entry like Ellis Island used to serve us, would be a higher priority as well, with centers on both Atlantic and Pacific coasts as well as one in say Texas. It may help alleviate our porous border, by funneling people through specific points where they have a better chance of gaining entry, and legally.

  2. #2 by Scott Erb on April 9, 2009 - 15:28

    I agree that language is important, though it does take a generation or so. My dad’s side of the family was German immigrants, and my mom’s side was from Norway. My Grandfather was a Lutheran Minister who gave German language sermons in towns where many people spoke only German (Lester Prairie, Minnesota, for example). Now, of course, it’s all English.

    In theory the Swiss prove you can have multiple languages, but most Swiss become multi-lingual. Having a segment only speak Spanish and another only speak English would not be good, and would reinforce divisions.

  3. #3 by Lee on April 9, 2009 - 16:41

    I totally agree. The job stealing is really so inaccurate. Where I work, we hire a temp service to provide the landscapers for the site each year. Typically we have the same latinos come back year after year. They are willing to work for a bit over minimum wage. They are diligent and hard workers. They are all legal to work in this country, but I am not sure this was always the case. They work hard at a job that is very physically demanding. This year a friend of a permanent employee needed a job and my boss added him to the landcape crew via the temp agency. The kid supposedly was getting ready to enlist because he couldn’t find a job. Since he began here he has complained over the low wages, and generally evidenced behavior that is starkly different from the attitude of our other landscapers. He is born and bred here and evidences an attitude of entitlement that I find sadly not uncommon. Yet these are the same people complaining that jobs are “stolen” by immigrants legal or otherwise.

    It would seem to me that a better immigration set up would actually be of huge benefit to our society as a whole. What happened to “give me your tired and your weak?”

  4. #4 by healingmagichands on April 10, 2009 - 00:35

    Lee has made a very good point. There have always been people who needed work very badly in this country. But do you see them doing stoop labor in the lettuce fields of California? Are they working as nannies or au pairs or maids? No, no, they are filing for disability, complaining etc.

    Jim (my husband) has said on numerous occasions that we should open the borders to anyone who wants to come north and work. As the file across the border, they should be given green cards and social security numbers. The rule would be, you’re welcome to work as long as you pay your taxes like everybody else and keep your nose clean. Screw up, break the law and you get sent back home and never get another work permit. Those who want to stay and get citizenship, apply like everybody else.

    Let us not forget the the vast majority of us (unless of Native American descent) are either immigrants or descendants of immigrants.

  5. #5 by henitsirk on April 10, 2009 - 21:41

    Growing up in California, I have always been aware of the immigration issue. Agriculture, much of construction, cooking and bussing in restaurants, cleaning of offices, and many other areas would come to a grinding halt there without immigrant labor, primarily that of Mexicans. Day laborers – jornaleros – are a fixture on many street corners. And as others have said, I’ve not seen any Americans of any ethnicity clamoring to compete for those jobs.

    I like HMH’s husband’s idea. Giving people legitimacy through taxation at least takes away the argument that illegal immigrants drain our public services without directly paying for them. I’m also not sure I understand the importance of national borders, citizenship, and so on, other than for taxation and receiving public benefits.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: