The Crime of the Century

“Now they’re planning the crime of the century
Well what will it be?
Read all about their schemes and adventuring
It’s well worth the fee
So roll up and see
How they rape the universe
How it’s gone from bad to worse
Who are these men of lust, greed and glory
Rip off the masks and let’s see
But that’s not right, oh no, what’s the story
But there’s you and there’s me
(that can’t be right…)
— Crime of the Century
, Supertramp, title track from their 1973 LP
(Song by Roger Hodgson and Rick Davies)

As the oil gushes into the Gulf of Mexico, the fingers of blame are pointed everywhere.   Some on the right blame Obama for not being “forceful” in his response.   Others blame British Petroleum (BP) for overlooking dangers and possible design flaws.  Still others blame the oil industry in general for undertaking deep sea drilling without really making sure it’s safe.  Even others blame Halliburton for shoddy work.

But if we rip off the masks to see who’s really to blame, we look in the mirror.  We are the ones demanding oil.   I’m probably more to blame than many — we heat our home with oil, I help lead travel courses to Europe, we drive to camp grounds and on vacations.   Our house has too many square feet, and I buy countless petroleum based products.   I consume, buy my kids too many cheap toys, and waste.  Moreover, even as I know this is the problem — that we are addicted to oil and consumption — I can’t break my habit.

I know people who really do try to live an energy conscious life style.  But when I think of what I’d have to give up, and the fact that most people would go on consuming and nothing would really change, it seems normal to simply go along with the flow.   Anyway, just about everyone does it, right?

Therein lies the problem.   As long as oil is relatively cheap, and the consequences of our addiction tolerable (just think of what drug addicts will endure before they change) we go on.   Oil companies drill in deeper water, politicians scream “drill, baby, drill” and people scoff about global warming or warnings that such deep drilling is dangerous.   Such is our nature as humans.

If we want to believe that we can consume oil without regard to the environment, that oil supplies will last, and that drilling is always safe, there will be those who will give us a story to rationalize not looking closely at our choices and their consequences.   Drilling is safe, there is undiscovered oil everywhere, global warming is a myth, go on and live without regard to the consequences of our actions.  People believe what they want to believe; they want to believe that which allows them continue their habits and hold on to beliefs they’ve become used to.

Serious commentators will develop sophisticated arguments to support their position.   Oil companies will nurture bloggers and the press with trips to oil rigs and seemingly flawless studies to support their position.   Books supposedly “debunking” global warming theory will pop up, questions about one bit of evidence (something all science has) will be used to dismiss all evidence.    Weird bits of evidence will be presented as if they disproved science (e.g., a claim that deep oil rigs prove that oil is simply an earth by product of virtually unlimited supply).  Those who believe what is for them convenient will think that the others are duped.

In all the noise, of course we’ll find support for what we want to believe.  How could we not?  There is a blog to fit every point of view, movements from the tea party to “yes we can.”   Anarchists will find like minded folk convinced that government is the only real evil; socialists will find comrades who believe capitalism is the reason for all our woes.  And, of course, there is always uncertainty — an opening to simply grasp what we want to believe and hold it.

So we consume.   It’s good for the economy, after all, and there’s always someone telling us we need X, and credit is easy to get for Y.   We demand more oil.   And the consequences follow.   And suddenly it’s BP’s fault.  Obama’s fault.  The lax regulation of the Bush Administration’s fault.  But really, it’s our fault.   And those like me who are concerned about global warming, peak oil, and the environment have no business proclaiming any superiority to those who don’t — I consume as much if not more than most of them.   Talking the talk is meaningless if you don’t walk the walk.

So as I reflect on the oil plunging into the Gulf, perhaps all summer and beyond, with other wells also at risk, I really don’t feel like demonizing an oil company or a politician.  I can (and just have) criticized our oil addicted materialistic consumer culture, but in so doing I’m like a drunk condemning alcoholism.  I’m a part of the problem.   So, the challenge of the oil spill for me is not to blame others, but to look at the mirror.   What can I change in my life?  This event is real, the consequences will be with us for a long time.   Likely, worse is yet to come.   I’m as much to blame as anyone.

It won’t be easy, and it will take some time, but my behavior has to change.

About these ads
  1. #1 by Lee on June 11, 2010 - 12:23

    My wife and I were talking about this the other night. There was a report on how a community in MA was upset about the noise of wind turbines and how much it was distressing the abutters. My wife has super keen hearing and was siding with the property owners. My point is that we can’t have our cake and eat it too. We can continue walking this path to the detriment of our quality of life long term, or we can try making changes. One of my little efforts is taking public transportation from my city to Boston instead of trying to drive. (I admit fear of city traffic also drives this! LOL) But it is a better choice for the enviroment even though ironically it costs me slightly more than if I had nerves of steel and drove.

  2. #2 by Mike Lovell on June 11, 2010 - 15:58

    The biggest problem with the oil consumption issue is basically this…. if you want to walk the walk, you practically have to live the Amish lifestyle to avoid oil consumption. Every reach of our lives, every product we use, consume, or look at, oil is there. To switch to almost anything else, since oil is about the cheapest flexible (all-encompassing uses) material on the market, you pretty much gaurantee the widening of the gap between rich and poor with even less people controlling the money than do now. While I agree with teh alternative energy sources idea in general, that only covers your electric grid and fuel supply….everything else is still at the mercy of oil, unless we reduce every task, including writing to the point of hard labor.

    At this point, you’re kind of damned if you do, damned if you don’t…unless you’re unGodly wealthy, then you can do whatever you want.

  3. #3 by Adrienne on June 15, 2010 - 15:18

    I think that this issue is an echo of most other issues we go up against – political or otherwise. It takes massive amounts of people to get one to catch on, yet no one wants to be one of the few who have to start. If we demanded it of our companies, or (as is happening slowly with the Green movement) if we put our power – our dollars – into the change we want to see, companies will have to follow suit to stay in business. Yet, as you have said, it is terribly difficult to live without oil, and there really aren’t alternatives to start investing in. It is a problem that I think comes from all sides: Obama/government, BP/industry and us. And therefore the solutions will have to come from everyone as well. Government will have to start enforcing more responsible choices, industry will have to start making alternatives available, and we will have to start switching over to those alternatives.

  4. #4 by Scott Erb on June 15, 2010 - 16:02

    I think I agree with all of you. Personally, the government is providing an incentive to look into solar powers and more efficient heating with a 30% tax break. Right now we have a boiler that would be banned in Europe — hot water baseboard and it provides hot water for the house, meaning it’s running far more than it needs to. That is something I just can’t tolerate any more. A mix of solar and a more efficient system can ultimately pay for itself, and burn less oil. I think we have to just have to make little changes and hope those add up. Otherwise, it’s just too big a problem.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,170 other followers

%d bloggers like this: